Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Ensure Fall Mat Placement for Resident at Risk of Falls

Irving, Texas Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with a history of falls, unsteadiness on her feet, and severe cognitive impairment was observed lying in bed without a fall mat placed alongside her bed, as required by her care plan. The resident's care plan, updated after a hip fracture from a previous fall, specifically included the intervention of having a floor mat alongside the bed to prevent further accidents. During the observation, the fall mat was found under the bed rather than in the correct position next to it. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the resident was considered a fall risk and that both the low bed position and the placement of the fall mat alongside the bed were necessary interventions. Staff acknowledged that the fall mat should have been in place and that its absence was likely due to it not being repositioned after care activities. The facility's policy on fall management also requires maintaining an environment as free of accident hazards as possible and implementing appropriate interventions to prevent falls.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙