Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Monitor High-Risk Resident for Elopement

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to monitor and document hourly rounds for a resident identified as being at high risk for elopement. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, alcohol dependence, and heart failure, was assessed as lacking capacity to make decisions and exhibited daily wandering behavior, hallucinations, and a verbalized desire to leave the facility. Despite these risk factors, the resident was not included on the list for hourly rounds, and there was no documentation of monitoring from April to early May. The care plan for this resident specifically indicated the need for constant monitoring due to the risk of elopement, but this intervention was not implemented. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN, the Director of Staff Development, and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the care plan interventions were not followed as required. The facility's own policy required identification and monitoring of residents at risk for unsafe wandering or elopement, with care plans to include detailed monitoring plans. However, the lack of documentation and failure to include the resident in hourly rounds demonstrated that these procedures were not carried out, resulting in a deficiency related to accident prevention and supervision.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙