Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Use of Physical Restraints

Santa Monica, California Survey Completed on 05-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraint by not completing informed consent for the use of bed siderails and a geri-chair with lap tray, as required by individualized assessment. The resident in question had diagnoses including encephalopathy, COPD, and unspecified dementia, with severely impaired cognitive skills and required moderate assistance for activities of daily living. Despite these conditions, there was no physician order for the use of bed siderails, and the care plan did not address their use. Additionally, the medical record lacked informed consent documentation for both the bed siderails and the geri-chair with lap tray. Observations over several days showed the resident sitting in a geri-chair with a lap tray in the hallway, sometimes unattended, and later lying in bed with bed siderails up. Staff interviews confirmed that there should have been orders and care plans for these devices, and that informed consent was necessary due to the potential for these devices to restrict movement. The physical restraint assessment recommended the use of a geri-chair with tray due to poor safety judgment, but documentation was incomplete and did not reflect proper assessment or consent procedures. Facility policy required that any device restricting a resident's movement, such as bedrails or a geri-chair with a tray, be considered a restraint if the resident could not remove it independently. The policy also mandated a physician's order and informed consent for such devices, specifying the reason, benefit, type, and duration of restraint. In this case, these requirements were not met, resulting in a violation of the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity regarding the use of physical restraints.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙