Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident with Hearing Loss

Riverside, California Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident with hearing loss was accurately coded. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of right ear hearing loss and used a hearing aid in the left ear. Multiple records, including the inventory sheet and social service summary, documented the presence and use of a left hearing aid and noted moderate hearing difficulty. However, the MDS assessment incorrectly indicated that the resident was not using a hearing aid and had adequate hearing ability. During interviews, both the MDS Nurse and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the MDS assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's actual hearing status and should have been coded as moderately impaired with hearing. The facility's policy and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual require that assessments accurately reflect the resident's status, which was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙