Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Accurately Update PASRR for Resident with Schizophrenia

Victorville, California Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to update the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident who was admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Upon admission, the resident's medical record indicated diagnoses of schizophrenia, altered mental status, and dementia. However, the PASRR Level I screening completed at the hospital and used for admission did not include the schizophrenia diagnosis, marking the question regarding serious mental illness as 'NO.' This resulted in the PASRR resolution status being set to 'Level II not required,' which was inaccurate given the resident's actual condition. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Nurse and Assistant Directors of Nursing, revealed that the skilled nursing facility did not identify the discrepancy in the PASRR upon the resident's admission. The staff acknowledged that the PASRR should have been reviewed for accuracy and amended if necessary, but this process was not followed. The omission was only discovered later, and the PASRR was subsequently updated to reflect the correct diagnosis of schizophrenia. Further review of facility practices showed that there was no specific policy or procedure in place for the PASRR process. Staff relied on a general PASRR Level I Screening Assessment Guide, which outlined the need for accurate and current information and specified that major clinical errors required a new screening. The guide also indicated that certain PASRR resolutions, such as 'Categorical Review,' were not valid for admission to a Medicaid-certified skilled nursing facility, yet the resident's revised PASRR was marked as such, pending further review.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙