Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0881
E

Failure to Notify Physician of Culture Results and Inadequate Antibiotic Stewardship

Visalia, California Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program for a resident who exhibited signs of infection, including an elevated temperature and confusion. The attending physician gave a telephone order for cephalexin prior to the availability of urine culture and sensitivity results. When the urine culture later identified Proteus Mirabilis and provided susceptibility results, there was no evidence that the physician was notified of these findings. The infection preventionist stated it was the floor nurse's responsibility to inform the physician, but no documentation was provided to confirm that this occurred. As a result, the resident did not receive an antibiotic with the highest efficacy for the identified bacteria, as indicated by the culture and sensitivity report. Additionally, the facility did not follow its own policy requiring the primary care practitioner to assess the resident within 72 hours of a telephone order for antibiotics. Review of the physician's progress notes showed no documentation that the resident was evaluated for the urinary tract infection following the initial telephone order. The facility's policy on antibiotic stewardship specifically states that lab results and the current clinical situation should be communicated to the prescriber as soon as available, and that the practitioner should assess the resident within 72 hours of a telephone order, both of which were not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙