Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
D

Failure to Complete Accurate PASRR Assessments Prior to Admission

Renton, Washington Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed accurately and as required for two residents reviewed for PASRR screening. For one resident, the Level I PASRR received from the hospital did not include a diagnosis of anxiety, which was later identified and corrected by facility staff. However, although the corrected Level I PASRR included an indicator for Serious Mental Illness (SMI), a referral for a Level II evaluation was not made as required. For the second resident, the Level I PASRR completed at the hospital marked the resident as having no SMI indicators, but also identified depression as an SMI indicator in a subsection. Despite this, the form concluded that a Level II evaluation was not required, and the resident was admitted without the necessary Level II PASRR evaluation. Staff interviews confirmed that the expectation was for Level I PASRRs to be accurate and for Level II evaluations to be obtained when indicated. In both cases, the residents were admitted from the hospital with incomplete or inaccurate PASRR documentation, and the required follow-up for Level II evaluation was not performed, despite the presence of SMI indicators such as anxiety and depression. This failure resulted in the residents not being properly evaluated for mental health needs prior to admission.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙