Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences and Dietary Needs

Spokane, Washington Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor food preferences for three residents, resulting in multiple instances where residents received meals that did not align with their documented choices or dietary needs. One cognitively intact resident repeatedly received incorrect meals despite filling out menus and communicating their preferences, including being served barbequed ribs instead of shrimp scampi, scrambled eggs instead of boiled eggs, and fish and rice which they did not eat. Another cognitively intact resident did not receive yogurt and apple juice as indicated on their tray card, and was instead given orange juice and oatmeal. Staff interviews confirmed that residents' menu selections were sometimes lost, not returned to the kitchen in a timely manner, or not accurately transcribed onto meal tickets. A third resident, with moderate cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of failure to thrive, was served foods listed as dislikes on their dietary profile, such as scrambled eggs and potatoes, and was not offered alternatives. Staff acknowledged that meals were often returned to the kitchen due to incorrect orders, and that inconsistencies existed between menu selections and tray card information. The dietary manager noted that issues could arise from hurried or inexperienced kitchen staff, or from lapses in the menu collection process. These failures were observed through direct resident statements, meal observations, and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙