Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Provide Timely Vision Services

Auburn, Washington Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Resident 30 was admitted to the facility with adequate vision and no need for corrective lenses according to the initial assessment. However, observations showed the resident had eyeglasses and reported difficulty reading, stating that everything appeared blurry. The resident indicated they had requested an eye exam several months prior, but it had not been scheduled or completed, and no one had followed up with them regarding this request. The resident also reported that their current glasses were over two years old and that they needed new ones. A review of the resident's records revealed that an eye appointment was scheduled but not attended due to the resident feeling ill, with a follow-up planned for the following month. However, there was no evidence that the follow-up or any vision services were provided. Staff interviews confirmed that the process to reschedule the appointment was overlooked, and the resident's need for vision services was not addressed until brought to staff attention by surveyors. This failure resulted in the resident not receiving necessary vision care or updated assistive devices.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙