Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Assessments Across Multiple Domains

Auburn, Washington Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for five residents, resulting in multiple inaccuracies across various assessment domains. For one resident, staff documented adequate vision and no use of corrective lenses on several MDS assessments, despite observations of the resident using eyeglasses and stating a need for them. Additionally, a chronic ulcer treated by a contracted wound company was not reflected in the MDS, even though the resident was being treated for it at the time. Another resident was incorrectly coded as not interviewable for cognitive patterns and as demonstrating delusions, despite multiple observations and staff interviews confirming the resident was able to communicate and did not exhibit delusional behavior. For a third resident, the MDS inaccurately indicated staff were unable to examine dental status, and inconsistencies were found regarding the resident's ability to communicate and primary language. Staff failed to document the need for an interpreter, even though the resident's family confirmed Samoan as the primary language and that the resident would benefit from interpretation services. Further, one resident's MDS inaccurately reported no natural teeth, while both care plans and direct observation confirmed the presence of two natural teeth, which were loose and causing chewing difficulties. Another resident's discharge MDS incorrectly documented the discharge location as a hospital, while the discharge summary indicated the resident was sent home. In each case, staff interviews confirmed the MDS assessments were completed inaccurately, leading to discrepancies between the residents' actual conditions and their documented assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙