Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan with Resident's Caregiver Preference

Lynchburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one resident following the identification of a specific care preference. The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis, cardiomyopathy, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, and depression, was assessed as cognitively intact. During an interview, the resident expressed a preference for female caregivers to provide personal care, a preference that had been honored in practice by the facility. However, a review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 3/28/25, showed that while assistance with activities of daily living was documented, there was no mention of the resident's preference for female caregivers. Interviews with facility staff, including the LPN unit manager and the RN MDS coordinator, confirmed that this preference should have been included in the care plan but was not. The omission was acknowledged by staff during the survey, and no additional information was provided by facility leadership before the survey concluded.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙