Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Assess Alternatives and Entrapment Risk Prior to Bedrail Use

Orangeburg, South Carolina Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that alternative measures were attempted prior to the installation of side rails and did not complete proper assessments for the risk of entrapment for a resident reviewed for side rail use. Review of the resident's care plan and order summary indicated that side rails were implemented for enabling increased movement and for turning and repositioning, but there was no documented evidence in the electronic medical record that alternatives to side rails were considered or attempted before their use. Additionally, there was no documentation of an assessment for the risk of entrapment related to the use of side rails. Interviews with facility staff revealed that bedrails were routinely provided to residents upon admission without exploring alternatives, and staff were not aware of the requirement to consider alternatives prior to bedrail use. The LPN stated that nearly all residents received bedrails on the day of admission and that alternatives were not explored. The Maintenance Director confirmed that while monthly audits of bedrails were conducted for functionality and mattress fit, there was no formal assessment for entrapment risk, nor was there a device available to check for such risk. The DON also indicated a lack of awareness regarding the need to explore alternatives before bedrail use and stated that assessments were expected but not consistently performed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙