Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Preferences and Allergies

Rio Piedras, PR Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for two out of eight sampled residents. One resident reported repeatedly receiving food she does not eat and was not offered alternative options, despite her dietary preferences being documented in her initial nutrition assessment. Another resident stated she does not drink milk but was served milk on several occasions without being offered a substitute, even though her preferences were also documented. Review of both residents' meal cards confirmed that their taste and preference specifications were included. Additionally, the facility's menu cycle review revealed that there was no alternate menu available for residents who do not like the food served. These findings were based on dining observations, record reviews, and resident interviews conducted over a three-day period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙