Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Consistently Implement Restorative Ambulation Program

Kingston, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to consistently provide restorative nursing services as planned to maintain mobility for a resident with a history of obstructive hydrocephalus, anxiety, and depression. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and non-ambulatory upon admission, received physical therapy and was discharged with the ability to ambulate 25 feet with contact guard assistance. The discharge summary recommended continued ambulation with a rolling walker for short distances, and a care plan was developed to support walking in the resident's room with staff assistance. However, documentation showed that the resident participated in the ambulation program on only four out of eleven days, with reasons for missed sessions including refusal, deferred due to condition, and unavailability. There was no evidence that licensed staff were aware of or evaluated the resident's refusals or missed ambulation sessions at the time they occurred. The Assistant Director of Nursing was unable to provide documentation that the restorative ambulation program was implemented as planned or that missed sessions were addressed to ensure the resident's ambulation goals were met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙