Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Ensure Physician Orders, Care Planning, and Hospice Coordination

Montoursville, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders, resident preferences, and goals for three residents. For one resident with two skin tears on the left leg, staff applied a Tegaderm dressing instead of the Aquacel foam dressing specified in the facility's wound care protocol. Documentation did not show that a physician was contacted prior to implementing this treatment, and the physician later clarified that proper procedures for obtaining orders were not followed, as there was an on-call provider available and no direct communication occurred before the treatment was initiated. Another resident, admitted with a cardiac pacemaker, had a baseline care plan that included instructions for pacemaker checks but did not specify the method or equipment to be used. The resident reported having a home monitoring machine prior to admission but did not have it in the facility until after the surveyor's inquiry. There was no evidence that the need for a pacemaker monitoring device was identified or addressed in the care plan upon admission, and the device was only brought to the facility after staff were prompted by the surveyor. A third resident, admitted with hospice services for terminal dementia, had a care plan that did not integrate hospice services or specify the hospice provider, disciplines involved, or frequency of services. The care plan lacked documentation of the full range of hospice services to be provided for the management of the resident's terminal illness, and there was no evidence of coordination between the facility and the hospice provider.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙