Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0801
D

Failure to Employ Qualified Registered Dietitian

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to employ a qualified registered dietitian as required by regulations. Review of the dietitian's job description outlined responsibilities such as assessing nutritional needs, developing individualized nutrition care plans, conducting nutrition-focused physical exams, and collaborating with the interdisciplinary team. However, the individual serving as the registered dietitian had not completed the mandatory LDN licensure exam and was working under the direct supervision of a regional dietitian. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the dietitian had not obtained the required licensure. Further review of resident records showed that the unlicensed dietitian was the only staff member documenting and reviewing clinical notes related to significant weight loss for a resident. There was no evidence that a licensed dietitian reviewed or consulted on any clinical documents, nor was there a cosignature or indication of oversight by the regional dietitian. This lack of qualified oversight and documentation directly contributed to the deficiency cited.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙