Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Respect Resident Dignity in Use of Wandering Security Bracelet

Pennsburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care and services in a manner respectful of a resident's dignity, as required by regulation. A review of facility policy indicated that wandering security bracelets are to be used for residents at risk of elopement or unsafe wandering. Clinical record review for a resident admitted with pyogenic arthritis and spinal stenosis showed that the resident was not cognitively impaired, required supervision for ambulation and transfers, and did not exhibit wandering behavior. Elopement evaluations initially indicated no risk, and although a later evaluation noted the resident expressed a desire to go home and was labeled as wandering, there was no supporting evidence in the clinical record of actual wandering or elopement attempts. Observation revealed the resident wearing a wandering security bracelet, and during an interview, the resident expressed feeling insulted by the bracelet and stated they were only at the facility for antibiotics and physical therapy, wishing only to go outside when weather permitted. There was no documentation that the use of the bracelet was discussed with the resident or that the resident consented to its use. The facility administrator confirmed that the resident should not have had the wandering security bracelet.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙