Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Discharge Status Documentation

Kingston, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident, specifically regarding the resident's discharge status. A review of the clinical record showed that the resident was admitted and later discharged to the hospital. The resident was private pay and chose not to continue private payment to hold their room during the hospitalization, which is a key indicator that the return to the facility was not anticipated. Despite this, the MDS assessment documented the discharge as 'return anticipated' in Section A0310F, which was inconsistent with the resident's payor status and discharge planning information. During an interview, the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator acknowledged the inaccuracy in the MDS assessment and confirmed that the discharge should have been recorded as 'return not anticipated.' This discrepancy was identified through a review of the clinical record, the RAI, and staff interviews, indicating that the facility did not accurately reflect the resident's discharge status as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙