Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Prevent Use of Physical Restraint Without Assessment or Physician Order

Yeadon, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, as required by policy and regulation. Facility policy states that physical restraints may only be used to treat medical symptoms and must never be used for staff convenience or discipline. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment, functional limitations in range of motion, and a high risk for falls, observations revealed that the resident's bed was pushed against the wall and a wedge was positioned under the sheets on one side. The use of the bed against the wall was confirmed by a registered nurse, who acknowledged that this could act as a restraint. A review of the resident's clinical record showed no documentation of a physical restraint assessment or a physician's order authorizing the bed to be pushed against the wall. The resident's care plan identified a high risk for falls but did not include the use of the bed against the wall as an intervention. The deficiency was identified through review of facility policy, clinical records, direct observation, and staff interview.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙