Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Obtain Physician Order and Monitor Bi-pap Use

Gahanna, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,500
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to obtain a current physician order and provide appropriate monitoring for a resident using a Bi-pap non-invasive ventilation device. The resident, who had multiple complex diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea, and other chronic conditions, was observed on two occasions using the Bi-pap machine with oxygen. However, review of the medical record showed that the only physician order for Bi-pap had been discontinued, and there was no active order specifying the settings, application, or monitoring requirements for the device. Additionally, the resident's care plan did not address the use of oxygen or Bi-pap, and the comprehensive MDS assessment did not indicate the use of these respiratory therapies. Further review of the resident's records revealed ongoing orders for oxygen therapy but none for Bi-pap after the previous order was discontinued. Interdisciplinary team notes indicated the resident was non-compliant with Bi-pap but would use nasal cannula oxygen. Despite this, direct observation confirmed the resident was using the Bi-pap device without a current physician order or documented monitoring. Interview with the regional nurse confirmed the absence of an order for the Bi-pap machine's use and monitoring.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙