Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident's Bathing Preferences

Richfield, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's bathing preferences, specifically the preference for tub baths over showers. The resident, who had diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, dementia, ataxia following cerebral infarction, and aneurysm, was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance for showering. Documentation showed frequent refusals of bathing, but there was no evidence that the facility investigated the reasons for these refusals or provided a tub bath as preferred. The resident's care plan and Kardex did not reflect her preference for tub baths, and shower documentation did not indicate any attempts to accommodate this preference. Interviews with the resident, her daughter, and staff confirmed that the resident disliked showers due to water spraying in her face and had repeatedly expressed a preference for tub baths. The Director of Nursing was unaware of this preference, despite the availability of bathtubs in the facility. The resident's daughter also reported concerns about her mother's hygiene, stating she had to cut her mother's hair due to it being dirty. The facility's policy allowed for various bathing methods, but there was no evidence that the resident's preference for tub baths was accommodated.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙