Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Apply Palm Guard as Ordered and Inaccurate Documentation

Niles, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and muscle wasting was not provided with a palm guard as ordered by the physician. The resident's medical record indicated a diagnosis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left side, and the resident was assessed as having severe cognitive impairment, requiring substantial or maximum assistance with all activities of daily living. The physician's order specified that the palm guard should be worn daily and removed only for hand hygiene and skin checks. Despite documentation in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that staff verified the palm guard was worn daily throughout the month, direct observations on two separate occasions revealed the resident was not wearing the device. The resident reported not often wearing the palm guard but was unsure of the reason. An LPN confirmed the resident was not wearing the palm guard and stated the resident often refused it, yet there was no documentation of refusals or behaviors in the TAR. The TAR continued to be signed off as if the device was applied daily, contrary to actual practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙