Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0881
D

Failure to Implement Antibiotic Stewardship Protocols

Lancaster, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement appropriate antibiotic stewardship for one resident who was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including a urinary tract infection (UTI). Medical record review showed that the resident was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine, and had a recent history of UTI. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter for a period prior to the incident. On a specific date, the resident complained of back pain and dysuria, and cloudy urine was observed. A urinalysis was sent for analysis, but a prophylactic antibiotic (Bactrim) was started before the urinalysis and urine culture results were available. The resident continued to receive Bactrim pending the results, and fluids were encouraged. The urine culture later revealed the presence of Escherichia coli (sensitive to Bactrim) and enterococcus faecalis (not sensitive to Bactrim). The resident was then started on a different antibiotic (Cipro) after the culture results were received. An interview with an LPN confirmed that antibiotics were started prior to receiving test results, and that the physician assistant routinely orders antibiotics prophylactically without confirming appropriateness. Facility policy required assessment and diagnostic testing to guide antibiotic use, but this protocol was not followed in this case. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙