Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Complete Required Side Rail Assessment and Consent

Jacksonville, North Carolina Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow required procedures before installing and utilizing bilateral quarter length side rails for a resident. Specifically, there was no evidence that alternatives to side rails were attempted, that an assessment for entrapment risk was conducted, or that the risks and benefits of side rail use were reviewed with the resident. Additionally, informed consent was not obtained prior to the installation and use of the side rails. These omissions were identified through observations, record review, and interviews with the resident and staff. The resident involved was admitted with acute and chronic respiratory failure, was cognitively intact, and had impairments in both upper and lower extremities, requiring substantial to maximum assistance with bed mobility. The resident was observed multiple times with the side rails in the raised position and stated she needed them for bed mobility and positioning. Interviews with staff revealed confusion regarding responsibility for completing the side rail assessment, with the admitting nurse indicating it was the Unit Manager's responsibility, while the DON and Administrator stated the admitting nurse should have completed the assessment. No documentation of the required assessment or consent process was found in the resident's electronic medical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙