Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences and Provide Menu Alternatives

Richton, Mississippi Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a recent admission for a left humerus fracture, who was cognitively intact as indicated by a BIMS score of 15, repeatedly communicated a food preference of not eating chicken to Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). Despite this, the resident continued to receive meals containing chicken. On one occasion, the resident informed CNA #1 that he did not eat chicken when his meal tray included chicken and dumplings, but no alternate meal was offered, and the CNA was unaware of the available menu alternative. The facility's policies required staff to elicit and respect residents' individual food preferences and to offer substitutes of similar nutritive value when a resident refused food served. The Dietary Manager acknowledged being informed of the resident's preference several days prior but failed to update the meal ticket system accordingly. As a result, the resident's food preference was not honored, and appropriate menu alternatives were not provided as required by facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙