Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0881
D

Failure to Follow Antibiotic Stewardship Protocols for UTI Treatment

Cokato, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that prescribed antibiotics met established criteria for use and did not adequately assess the continued need for antibiotics for a resident with a urinary tract infection (UTI). The resident, who was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter along with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and obstructive uropathy, was prescribed cefpodoxime after completing a previous course of Macrobid without improvement. The provider ordered a urinalysis and urine culture, with instructions to update the antibiotic based on culture and sensitivity results. However, the urine culture indicated likely contamination, and there was no evidence that the culture and sensitivity results were reviewed by nursing staff or that the provider was notified when sensitivities were not received. The clinical record lacked documentation that antibiotic stewardship guidelines were followed, including the completion of a 72-hour antibiotic time-out and review of the appropriateness of continued antibiotic therapy. The facility's infection preventionist confirmed that these steps were not completed and acknowledged that the antibiotic stewardship policy, which requires regular review of antimicrobial therapy, was not adhered to in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙