Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0741
D

Failure to Attempt and Document Non-Pharmacological Interventions Before PRN Psychotropic Use

Cokato, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and documented prior to the administration of PRN psychotropic medications for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and behavioral symptoms. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, delusional disorders, and depression, had a care plan that included non-pharmacological approaches such as reassurance, encouraging activities of choice, 1:1 visits, and redirection. Despite these care plan interventions, documentation showed that lorazepam was administered on multiple occasions for behavior issues or other reasons, but there was no evidence in the clinical record or behavior monitoring logs that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted before medication was given. The facility's records, including the Medication Administration Record and Target Behavior Monitoring logs, lacked documentation of target behavior episodes and management interventions for the relevant dates when the PRN psychotropic was administered. Interviews with the consulting pharmacist and the DON confirmed that non-pharmacological interventions should have been attempted and documented prior to administering PRN psychotropics, except in severe situations. The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding this practice when requested.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙