Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Follow Up on Urology Referral for Resident with Neurogenic Bladder

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow up on a urology referral for a resident with paraplegia and neurogenic bladder, who was admitted with a Foley catheter and required substantial assistance with mobility and toileting. The resident's care plan included interventions such as monitoring catheter output, changing the catheter monthly, and administering bowel medications as ordered. Hospital discharge orders specifically indicated the need for a urology appointment due to bladder spasms and urine bypassing the Foley catheter. Despite these orders, interviews and document review revealed that the Health Unit Coordinator (HUC) did not schedule the required urology appointment and was unable to provide a reason for this omission. The process for entering and verifying discharge orders involved both the HUC and nursing staff, with responsibilities for comparing and clarifying orders upon admission. However, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no record of a completed or scheduled urology appointment for the resident. A facility policy regarding coordination of care was requested but not provided.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙