Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop Comprehensive Pacemaker Care Plans

Boston, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized care plans for two residents with cardiac pacemakers. For one resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a pacemaker, the care plan did not include essential pacemaker information such as the make, model, serial number, implant date, paced rate, frequency of pacemaker checks, or cardiologist contact details. The resident was dependent on staff for daily activities and had an active diagnosis of a cardiac pacemaker, but the care plan lacked the required documentation and monitoring details as outlined in the facility's own policy. Similarly, another resident with an atrioventricular block and a pacemaker did not have a care plan that included the cardiologist's information, paced rate, or frequency of pacemaker checks. Interviews with nursing staff revealed uncertainty about the need to include specific pacemaker information in care plans, and the DON confirmed that such details should be present. The facility's failure to document and plan for the monitoring and care of residents with pacemakers was identified through record review and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙