Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
E

Failure to Post Correct Menu and Offer Meal Alternatives

Onawa, Iowa Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to post the correct lunch menu and did not ensure that residents were offered meal options as required. On the day of observation, the posted menu listed spaghetti with meat sauce, seasonal vegetable, garlic toast, and pumpkin dessert for lunch, but the meal actually served was goulash, garlic toast, mixed vegetables, and poppy seed cake. Staff reported that menu changes were due to transitioning to a new management company and using up existing food supplies. The dietary staff did not complete the task of asking residents about meal alternatives that morning, and residents were not informed of the menu changes. Multiple residents reported that they were not asked about their meal preferences or offered alternatives, despite facility documents stating that dietary staff should be informed of alternatives by a specific time. One resident with intact cognitive ability noted that staff did not always come around to ask about meal choices. Another resident with a moderate cognitive deficit could not tolerate peas in the mixed vegetables and was not offered a substitute. A third resident on a low salt, diabetic diet stated she would have preferred a smaller portion if asked. The Dietary Manager was unaware of any facility policy on food choices, and the process for offering alternatives was inconsistently followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙