Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0725
E

Failure to Timely Respond to Resident Call Lights

Waterloo, Iowa Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to consistently answer resident call lights in a timely manner, as required by policy and regulatory standards. Multiple resident interviews revealed that call lights were often not answered within 15 minutes, with one resident reporting frequent delays and another stating they had to wait over an hour for assistance while on the commode. Call light system reports for several rooms over a one-week period documented numerous instances where response times exceeded 15 minutes, with some calls going unanswered for over an hour. The average response times for certain rooms ranged from 11 minutes to over 1.5 hours, far exceeding the facility's expectations for timely response. Residents involved had varying levels of cognitive function, as indicated by their BIMS scores, with some having intact cognition and others moderate impairment. Staff interviews confirmed that call lights should be answered promptly and that staff are expected to monitor call light notifications on their mobile devices. Facility policy requires call lights to be answered in a timely manner, but documented response times and resident reports indicate this standard was not consistently met during the review period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙