Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment Coding for Resident with Psychiatric Diagnoses

Grayville, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for one resident. The resident, a 71-year-old individual with multiple diagnoses including unspecified atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, edema, osteoarthritis, obesity, venous insufficiency, and psychiatric/mood disorders, had an MDS annual assessment completed with discrepancies. Specifically, Section A1500 of the MDS, which addresses the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), was marked as 'No' for serious mental illness or intellectual disability, despite the resident having active diagnoses of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia as indicated in Section I of the same assessment. Interviews revealed that the LPN responsible for MDS at the time of the survey was not the one who completed the July MDS and was not employed at the facility during that period. The LPN acknowledged that Section A1500 was not documented appropriately. The facility administrator confirmed there was no specific policy for accurately completing MDS assessments and stated that staff are expected to follow the RAI Manual for guidance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙