Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Contact Isolation Protocols for Resident with ESBL/VRE Infection

Palos Park, Illinois Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $31,425
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to follow the facility's transmission-based precautions policy for a resident with a documented ESBL/VRE urinary tract infection who was under contact isolation. On two separate occasions, staff entered the resident's room without donning the required personal protective equipment (PPE). One CNA entered the room with only a surgical mask, did not wear gloves or a gown, and did not perform hand hygiene before entry, despite signage indicating contact isolation. The CNA handled items in the room and assisted the resident with a meal before exiting and using hand sanitizer. The CNA stated they were unaware of the type of isolation required for the resident. A nurse also entered the same resident's room wearing only gloves, omitting the gown as required by the posted contact isolation sign. The nurse was unable to confirm the resident's current isolation status and stated confusion regarding whether the resident was on contact isolation or enhanced barrier precautions. The infection prevention nurse later confirmed that the resident was on contact isolation and that staff are expected to don gown, mask, and gloves prior to entry. The resident's care plan did not address contact isolation, despite physician orders and infectious disease notes specifying the need for such precautions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙