Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Pressure Ulcer and Discharge Status

South Chicago Height, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two of three residents reviewed. For one resident, interviews with the resident and the Wound Care Coordinator confirmed that the resident had never been diagnosed with or treated for a stage 3 pressure ulcer while at the facility. Despite this, the resident's MDS documented the presence of one unhealed stage 3 pressure ulcer. Review of the resident's current and previous physician order sheets showed no wound treatment orders, further supporting that no pressure ulcer care was provided. For another resident, the MDS indicated a planned discharge to the hospital. However, progress notes and interviews with facility staff confirmed that the resident left the facility against medical advice (AMA) and was discharged to the community, not the hospital. The MDS nurse acknowledged the error, stating that the discharge destination was incorrectly coded due to a misunderstanding of the resident's actual discharge status. Documentation, including a signed Release of Responsibility form, supported that the resident left AMA.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙