Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
G

Failure to Monitor and Intervene for Significant Weight Loss

Palos Hills, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $102,845
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to monitor and implement effective interventions for a resident at high risk for malnutrition, resulting in a 34.8% unplanned weight loss over less than six months. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including diabetes, muscle wasting, dysphagia, seizures, and gastrostomy status, and required substantial to maximal assistance with eating. Despite being on continuous enteral feeding with nothing by mouth status, the feeding order was changed in January to a twice-daily bolus, which provided only about half of the estimated caloric needs. Dietary notes repeatedly documented the resident's high risk for malnutrition, significant weight loss, and questioned the accuracy of some weight measurements, but no new interventions or adjustments to the feeding regimen were documented in response to the ongoing weight loss. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the resident's weight history and a lack of clear interventions or monitoring in response to the significant weight loss. The dietician acknowledged the weight loss and questioned the validity of previous weights but did not implement additional interventions, stating the resident's weight was stable at a lower level. The nurse practitioner was unaware of any concerns or interventions related to the weight loss. The facility's weight management policy required weekly weights and timely follow-up with dietary recommendations in cases of significant change, but there was no evidence these procedures were followed for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙