Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Implement Dietitian-Recommended Tube Feeding Order

Rockford, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a gastrostomy tube was observed to have their tube feeding pump set at an infusion rate of 55 ml per hour with a total volume of 1100 ml, despite a dietitian's recommendation to increase the rate to 60 ml per hour and a total volume of 1200 ml to address undesirable weight loss. The resident's medical record contained two conflicting tube feeding orders, both starting on the same date, one for 55 ml/hr and one for 60 ml/hr. The medication administration record and progress notes indicated that the resident consistently received the lower rate and volume over several days. During review, a registered nurse identified the discrepancy between the orders and acknowledged the need for clarification from the dietitian, confirming that only one order should be active. The dietitian confirmed her recommendation for the higher rate and volume to maintain the resident's weight. The resident's care plan required tube feeding to be administered as ordered, and facility policy directed staff to verify feeding orders. The failure to update and implement the dietitian's recommended tube feeding order resulted in the resident not receiving the prescribed nutritional support.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙