Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Failure to Offer Meal Choices and Follow Menus

Savannah, Georgia Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were offered meal choices and that menus were followed as required by policy. Multiple residents with little to no cognitive impairment reported that when they received meals in their rooms, they were not given a choice of food, and the only alternative offered was a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Residents stated they received whatever the facility provided without being informed of the menu or given an opportunity to select their meals. This lack of choice was specifically noted for residents who ate in their rooms, while those who ate in the dining room were able to make meal selections. Additionally, there were discrepancies between the meals listed on the posted menus, the meal tray tickets, and the actual food served to residents. For example, one resident was served meals that did not match either the tray ticket or the posted menu on two separate occasions. The Dietary Manager confirmed that residents receiving meals in their rooms were not informed of their meal options and could not explain the inconsistencies between the posted menus, tray tickets, and meals served. The Administrator acknowledged that all residents should be informed of the menu and offered alternatives, and that the posted meals should be served as written.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙