Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Correct Size Incontinence Briefs Compromises Resident Dignity

Savannah, Georgia Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced the dignity and respect of a resident who required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. The resident, who had diagnoses including morbid obesity and muscle weakness, reported that the facility often ran out of the correct size incontinence brief, resulting in the use of a smaller size that caused leakage. This situation led the resident to feel embarrassed and to request a bath each time leakage occurred. Staff interviews confirmed that residents were measured for brief size and that there were occasions when the correct size was unavailable, leading to the use of briefs from other residents' supplies, which might not fit properly. The Central Supplies Clerk acknowledged that the facility was running out of the 3x-size briefs, and the Administrator was aware that the resident was receiving a smaller brief than needed. The care plan for the resident included regular checks and provision of incontinence care, but the lack of appropriate supplies resulted in a failure to uphold the resident's dignity.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙