Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding of MDRO Status

Carmichael, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident, resulting in an inaccurate record regarding the resident's Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) status. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs. The MDS indicated the presence of an active MDRO diagnosis, but a review of the resident's transfer form, hospitalization record, and microbiology cultures showed no evidence of MDRO or need for isolation. The microbiology cultures specifically indicated a urinary infection with bacteria sensitive to multiple antibiotics, confirming the absence of MDRO. Observations revealed that there was no signage for contact-based precautions in the resident's room, and interviews with facility staff confirmed that the MDRO status was incorrectly marked on the MDS when laboratory results were still pending. Staff acknowledged that the MDS should have been updated once the lab results confirmed the absence of MDRO. The Director of Nursing also stated that the MDRO status should have been coded accurately and verified, and noted the absence of a facility policy specific to MDS completion.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙