Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences and Provide Alternatives

Huntington Park, California Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's food preferences and provide appropriate meal alternatives as required by the resident's care plan and dietary orders. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, and muscle weakness, was cognitively intact and able to make decisions regarding their care. Documentation indicated that the resident should be offered choices for snacks and that staff should honor food and fluid preferences. However, the resident reported not liking the meals provided, specifically grilled chicken and fish, and stated that no substitutes or snacks were offered. The resident also expressed a dislike for milk, which was not accommodated. Observations confirmed that the resident was served grilled fish and Ensure, despite the diet ticket specifying a preference for boiled meats and a dislike of milk. Staff interviews revealed that while there was a process for requesting meal substitutes, boiled beef was not offered as an option. The Dietary Supervisor acknowledged that the meal provided did not align with the resident's documented preferences and that the facility's policy required satisfaction of resident tastes and provision of food substitutions. This failure to provide preferred foods and alternatives was directly observed and confirmed through interviews and record reviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙