Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Monitor Significant Weight Loss in a Resident

Seal Beach, California Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to monitor a resident who experienced a significant weight loss of 6.71% in one month. According to the facility's policies and procedures, a weight loss of 5% or more in one month is considered a significant change of condition, requiring assessment and monitoring. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, was noted by the registered dietitian to have lost weight likely due to a recent acute care hospitalization, and dietary interventions were recommended, including increased milk intake and weekly monitoring of weights, oral intake, laboratory tests, and skin condition. Despite these recommendations and the facility's own protocols, there was no documented evidence that the resident was assessed or monitored for the significant weight loss. Observations showed the resident consumed only 20% of a lunch meal on one occasion, though intake was higher at breakfast on another day. Interviews with staff confirmed that the required monitoring and assessment following the change in condition did not occur. Facility leadership acknowledged that the resident was not monitored as required after the significant weight loss.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙