Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Failure to Provide Requested Meal Substitution

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 04-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that posted meal menus and resident meal requests were followed for a specific resident. Review of facility documentation showed that the resident had submitted a special request for a tuna melt as a replacement for the posted meal entrée on a specific date. Despite this documented request, the resident was served the standard menu items, which included pork, beans, bread, cake with strawberries, and cranberry juice, but not the requested tuna melt. The resident, who was determined to have decision-making capacity, confirmed during an interview that she did not receive the meal she wanted and indicated that this was not a frequent occurrence. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the Dietary Supervisor, confirmed that the resident's special meal request was missed and not provided as planned. The facility's policy required that food preferences and special requests be documented and followed, but this was not adhered to in this instance. The DON also verified the findings during a subsequent interview.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙