Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions

Sacramento, California Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement a care plan intervention to prevent falls for a resident with conversion disorder, decreased coordination, and impaired lower extremities who used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident had a documented fall, after which the care plan was updated to include keeping the bed in the lowest position and placing a fall mat on the floor. However, multiple observations revealed that the bed was not kept in the lowest position and the fall mat was not present. Staff interviews confirmed that the interventions were not consistently implemented, with one CNA stating the resident preferred the bed at a regular height and that the fall mat was missing. Record reviews and staff interviews further indicated that the required interventions were not documented as declined by the resident, nor was there evidence of consistent monitoring or documentation of the resident's response to the fall prevention measures. The DON confirmed that the expectation was for the bed to be kept in the lowest position and the fall mat to be in place whenever the resident was in bed, and that any resident preference for a different bed height should be documented, which was not done in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙