Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Document and Assess Skin During AFO Application for Resident with Limited ROM

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate care to maintain or improve range of motion (ROM) for a resident with contractures in both lower extremities. Despite a physician's order for the application of bilateral ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) for four hours daily, five times a week, the order was not consistently followed. Documentation was lacking regarding the exact times the AFOs were applied and removed, and there was no evidence that skin assessments were performed or recorded when the AFOs were in use. The resident's care plan addressed the use of AFOs to prevent decline in ROM, but did not include interventions for skin assessment during device application. Interviews with restorative nursing assistants (RNAs), a licensed vocational nurse (LVN), and an occupational therapist (OT) confirmed that while the AFOs were applied, there was no documentation of the timing or skin assessments. The facility's policy on restorative nursing care emphasized maintaining good body alignment and proper positioning, but did not specify skin assessment procedures. The director of nursing (DON) verified the findings, confirming the lack of documentation and absence of skin assessment protocols related to the use of AFOs for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙