Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Readmit Resident After Hospitalization in Accordance with Bed Hold Policy

Pasadena, California Survey Completed on 05-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to readmit a resident following discharge from a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH), despite the resident being medically stable and the facility having available beds. The resident, who had diagnoses including spondylosis, anxiety disorder, depression, and borderline personality disorder, was originally transferred to the hospital due to being a danger to herself. Upon discharge from the hospital, the GACH contacted the facility to arrange for the resident's return, but the facility refused readmission by order of the Administrator, even though the facility's policy and procedure on Bed Holds and Returns required that residents be permitted to return following hospitalization within the bed hold period. Record review and staff interviews confirmed that the facility's Director of Admissions and Administrator were aware of the policy but chose not to readmit the resident. The Administrator cited the resident's need for a private room due to having a dog and previous behavioral issues as reasons for the refusal. The facility's own policy, however, indicated that all residents, regardless of payer source, should be allowed to return to their previous room if available within the bed hold period. This action resulted in the resident being unable to return to the facility after hospital discharge.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙