Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0926
D

Failure to Complete Required Smoking Assessments for Resident Using Vape Device

Daingerfield, Texas Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its established smoking policy for one resident who was reviewed for smoking practices. The resident, a female with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, and anxiety disorder, was observed with a vape device on multiple occasions. Her comprehensive assessment indicated intact cognition and dependence on staff for several activities of daily living, and it was documented that she used tobacco. However, her care plan did not mention vaping or smoking, and there was no record of a completed safe smoking evaluation in her electronic health record. Interviews with staff revealed confusion and inconsistency regarding responsibility for completing smoking assessments. Some staff believed the MDS nurse was responsible, while others thought social services or charge nurses handled the assessments. The DON and ADON acknowledged that quarterly smoking assessments were required by policy, but could not confirm that these had been completed for the resident in question. The ADON also stated that the smoking assessment did not apply to vaping, despite the resident's use of a vape device. The facility's smoking policy required evaluation of smoking status and safe smoking ability upon admission, quarterly, and upon significant change in condition. Despite this, the resident's records lacked documentation of a safe smoking evaluation, and staff interviews confirmed that the required assessments had not been completed as per policy. This failure to follow the established policy was observed and confirmed through record review and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙