Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents on Contact Isolation

Sulphur Springs, Texas Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two residents who required contact isolation due to infections with ESBL and MRSA. For one resident with a history of urinary tract infection, diabetes, stroke, and severe cognitive impairment, a urinalysis revealed ESBL, and physician orders were in place for both antibiotics and contact isolation. However, the resident's care plan only addressed the UTI and did not include any interventions or objectives related to contact isolation for ESBL, despite visible isolation signage and orders in the medical record. For another resident with dementia, UTI, anxiety, and cognitive intactness, a urinalysis detected MRSA, and physician orders included antibiotics and contact isolation. The care plan did not address the need for contact isolation or the resident's refusal to comply with isolation protocols, as the resident was observed participating in group activities outside her room while on contact precautions. The care plan was only updated after surveyor intervention to include isolation measures. Interviews with facility staff, including the ADON, DON, Regional MDS nurse, and Administrator, revealed that care plan updates were the responsibility of the MDS nurses and management team, and that changes such as new orders should be reflected in the care plan within 24-48 hours. However, staff acknowledged that the care plans for these residents had not been updated to reflect the new isolation requirements or behavioral issues related to isolation refusal, despite being aware of the orders and discussing resident changes in daily meetings.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙