Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Complete Accurate PASRR Mental Health Screening

El Cajon, California Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete a mental health screening for one resident who was admitted with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. According to the admission record, the resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 screening was completed and indicated a negative result, not triggering a Level 2 mental health evaluation, despite the presence of a qualifying mental health diagnosis. The PASRR documentation also instructed the facility to resubmit a new Level 1 screening within 31 days, which was not done. Interviews with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the PASRR was inaccurate and should have led to a Level 2 evaluation, and that a new screening should have been completed within the required timeframe. The facility's policy also states that individuals meeting certain criteria should be referred for a Level 2 PASRR evaluation, which did not occur in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙