Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Sexual Abuse Allegations

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 04-14-2025

Penalty

Fine: $70,140
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate three separate allegations of sexual misconduct involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions, including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder. The resident, who is dependent for daily activities and has an activated Health Care Power of Attorney, reported incidents of sexual abuse on three occasions. Despite the facility's policy requiring prompt and comprehensive investigations, the investigations conducted did not include all necessary interviews or relevant questions specific to the allegations. In each case, the facility interviewed a standard sample of five residents using generic questions about rough treatment, feeling rushed, or staff frustration, none of which directly addressed the nature of the sexual abuse allegations. The resident's roommate, who could have been a key witness, was not interviewed for two of the incidents. Additionally, in one incident where a male staff member was present during the alleged event, no statement was obtained from him. The facility also failed to document whether any men were in the building at the time of one of the reported incidents. Interviews with facility leadership revealed that the investigation process was based on sampling rather than targeting individuals directly involved or potentially knowledgeable about the incidents. The Director of Social Services and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that their process did not require interviewing roommates or all relevant staff, and that the same set of unrelated questions was used for all resident interviews. This approach resulted in incomplete investigations that did not meet the facility's own policy requirements for abuse allegations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙