Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During High-Contact Care Activities

Muscoda, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement and maintain its infection prevention and control program as required, specifically regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two residents. For one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter, two CNAs transferred the resident from a wheelchair to the bathroom using a sit-to-stand machine and assisted with personal care activities, including moving the catheter bag and removing clothing, without wearing gloves or gowns. Both CNAs acknowledged after the fact that they were aware of the EBP requirements and should have worn appropriate PPE during these high-contact care activities, as indicated by the signage and care plan. In a separate incident, a resident with multiple wounds, including a pressure ulcer and venous ulcers, was observed during a wound dressing change. The Interim DON removed the resident's bandage and border dressing without wearing a gown, only donning gloves after handling the resident's leg. The Interim DON initially stated that a gown was not required unless there was a positive wound culture or excessive drainage, which contradicted the facility's policy and the expectations confirmed by the Vice President of Clinical and the Nursing Home Administrator, both of whom stated that both gown and gloves are required for wound care under EBP.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙